Homeland Security News

Homeland Security/Defense Industry Briefs

Homeland Security News

Firm Uses Non-Lethal Methods to Thwart Somali Pirates

November 25th, 2008 · 2 Comments

By Joe DeCapua, Voice of America

Somali Pirate Despite the international naval presence off the coast of Somalia, full protection against pirates cannot be given to all the tankers and cargo ships sailing in the Gulf of Aden. However, there’s an alternative being offered that does not involved the use of warships. A company called Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions (APMSS) uses non-lethal methods to prevent pirate attacks.

Nick Davis, chief executive of the firm, spoke from London to VOA English to Africa Service reporter Joe De Capua about why piracy has grown to be a serious problem in the Gulf of Aden.

“Primarily because of the amount of ships that are…transiting the area. Obviously, it is a pinch point to the Suez Canal. So, there’s an average of between…50 and 70 ships a day using the canal. Then you have those at anchorage. And with the busy Arabian Peninsula, you get them from all directions. So, incredibly busy area…certainly a lucrative one, as the pirates can see,” he says.

Somali Pirate All of the APMSS methods are non-lethal. Davis says, “We don’t carry weapons at all. We use acoustic devices, which are basically long-distance, very directional, loud hailing systems. And these emit…150 decibels over a distance of about a nautical mile…. And to give you an idea of…the human pain threshold for sound is 121 decibels. So, it’s pretty excruciating when you get within a short distance of this equipment, firing warning tones and messages at you.”

So far, he says that APMSS has been 100 percent successful and gives a recent example. “We ourselves had an encounter with pirates last Thursday in the Gulf of Aden, where our teams managed to…thwart and repel an attack by pirates that did come quite close to the vessel. But once we activated the evasive maneuvers and increased the speed of the ship and had all the fire hoses going and used the magnetic audio device, the acoustic device that we had on board, then the pirates just turned…and went for a vessel that was unarmed further south behind us,” he says.

Somali Pirate As the piracy problem escalated in the Gulf of Aden, ship owners faced the prospect of paying millions of dollars extra in insurance premiums. But says the cost of APMSS is much, much cheaper. “The cost of our service is $20,000 and that’s a fairly small price to pay to have an effective security solution on board,” he says.

Analysts have said that international naval vessels are too few in number to provide full protection for all the ships sailing in the Gulf of Aden. “They’re there with great big warships manned with between 300 and 700 people on board them. So, we’re effectively a three-man team with the necessary security equipment and experience to repel attacks. And our teams are embarked on these ships…. And they’re on board for 48 hours and then they get off again,” he says.

However, Davis says that no matter how much security is provided to ships, the solution to the Somali piracy problems lies in a political solution to the crisis in the country, which includes “infrastructure regeneration to the Somali people. Where they have no government, they have no ability to control their waters.”
Somali Pirate
He adds that poverty is a driving force behind the piracy attacks in the Gulf of Aden. “You know, these people (pirates) live in mud huts on the beach. So, they’re not really aware of what’s going on in the world. All they see is these ships that come in, these big fish factory ships that have sucked up all the tuna so that they can’t catch a single fish anymore. And these nice ships, moving cargo around the world that pay Egypt for the use of the canal…pay them nothing at all. And yet it’s destroyed their coastal development and abilities to earn money,” he says.
Davis adds, “They’re not out to be violent and killing crews…. They need money. They’re desperate for money and the money is shared within the communities. Yes, there are a couple of kingpin warlords that are controlling it all, but they are distributing the wealth along the coastline to the different villages and groups.”

Wikipedia Reference:

Piracy off the Somali coast has been a threat to international shipping since the beginning of Somalia’s civil war in the early 1990s. Since 2005, many international organizations, including the IMO, have expressed concern over the rise in acts of piracy. Piracy has contributed to a rise in shipping costs and impeded the delivery of food aid shipments. Ninety percent of the World Food Programme’s shipments arrive by sea, and ships have required a military escort. According to the Kenyan foreign minister, Somali pirates have received over $150 million (US dollars) in ransom money during the 12 months prior to November 2008.

Clashes have been reported between Somalia’s Islamist fighters, who are opposed to the Transitional Federal Government, and the pirates. In August 2008, Combined Task Force 150, a multinational coalition task force, took on the role of fighting Somali piracy by establishing a Maritime Security Patrol Area (MSPA) within the Gulf of Aden. The increasing threat posed by piracy also caused significant concerns in India since most of its shipping trade routes pass through the Gulf of Aden. The Indian Navy responded to these concerns by deploying a warship in the region on October 23, 2008. In September 2008, Russia announced that it too will soon join international efforts to combat piracy.[9]

On October 7, 2008, the United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 1838 calling on nations with vessels in the area to apply military force to repress the acts of piracy. At the 101st council of the International Maritime Organization, India called for a United Nations peacekeeping force under unified command to tackle piracy off Somalia. (There has been a general and complete arms embargo against Somalia since 1992.)

In November 2008, Somali pirates began hijacking ships well outside the Gulf of Aden, perhaps targeting ships headed for the port of Mombasa, Kenya. The November 11 attack upon the MV Powerful, 60 nautical miles south of the Yemeni coast, resulted in the failed attempt to hijack the ship and the death of two Somalis by Royal Navy forces.[14] On November 19, 2008, an Indian Navy frigate deployed in the region, the INS Tabar, destroyed a pirate vessel after the pirates threatened to attack the warship.

Photos: Mass communication Specialist 2nd Class Jason R. Zalasky, US Navy

Tags: Maritime Security

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 G. Keef // Jan 11, 2009 at 5:01 am

    Onboard Security Teams are critical

    The piracy problem in the Gulf of Aden is largely a derivative of the complex problems within Somalia. Piracy in general, however, continues to be a global crime affecting all parts of the world and has been going on for centuries. With that being said, I share my opinions coming from a seventeen year law enforcement background in the United States. Piracy, like most crimes involve an opportunity for a criminal element to take advantage of. The entire world is now aware of the opportunity in the Gulf of Aden and how the pirates from Somalia are the criminal element taking advantage of it. The maritime shipping industry stands to lose millions of dollars due to the increase of insurance costs and the change in operating procedures used to traverse the Gulf of Aden. This does not even take into account of the associated dangers the crews of these vessels are subjected to. It is mind boggling that there are currently over 300 crew members being held hostage off the coast of Somalia resulting from vessel highjacking. It certainly stands to reason why the international community has finally started to address this problem in the Gulf of Aden with a military response. I do not however, believe this is going to solve the piracy problem in the Gulf of Aden, it will only reduce the opportunity for the Somalian Pirates to pursue their criminal actions. The maritime shipping industry will need to take advantage of this historical international response and utilize the limited time they have to improve onboard security procedures. Maritime companies expecting crewmembers to defend their vessels with high-pressure water hoses while encountering pirates armed with machine-guns and rocket propelled grenade launchers would not appear to be an appropriate expectation. I would expect the maritime industry to see an increase of civil litigation brought upon by their own employees if an unfortunate injury or death occurs during this unreasonable task. I also believe the maritime shipping companies are correct in not arming their own crew members with firearms to address the problem. This option would certainly create a dangerous environment for the crew and subject the shipping companies to a separate area of liability. I will add one more thought regarding what I believe to be a knee-jerk response of some shipping companies hiring Private Military Companies (PMC) to address piracy. The PMC’s are a great resource and supplement to military operations in conflict areas as Iraq and Afghanistan. Most PMC’s employ ex-special force operators who are the best at what they do….operate in critical high risk environments conducting military operations away from the intricacies of civil liability. No doubt the PMC’s could provide a lethal solution to piracy and deter pirates from their perceived opportunity in the Gulf of Aden. As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, I come from a law enforcement background specializing in Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT). Municipal SWAT teams are trained and equipped to operate in high risk events, while accountable to civil liability and public trust. SWAT operations are tasked with brining high risk incidents to a conclusion in a manner that will maintain public confidence and offer transparency of events. Modern SWAT teams have the ability to deploy both lethal and non-lethal munitions and tactics. I believe this is the type of expertise the maritime shipping industry should focus on when implementing onboard security teams . This would allow the maritime shipping companies to address the threats of piracy, while maintaining an awareness of the surrounding liabilities. I welcome all comments regarding this article and piracy at gregkeef@sbcglobal.net

  • 2 Bruce Stenman // Jul 18, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    This will work a few times and then there will be the use of very inexpensive ear protectors by the pirates. $20 countermeasure that negates the effect of a $20,000 MAD or other LRAD is a great illustration of the advantage of the guerrilla even with current technology.

    Good actually that this is possible after corporate pirates from Mitsubishi and other companies sent their factory trawlers into Somalian waters and devastated the local fisheries. Time will tell if these technologies are truly useful at controlling the unruly inhabitants of Afghanistan and Iraq whose countries the USA corporate and military people invaded and now occupy by brute force.

Leave a Comment